On this day

May 17, 1930

Revisit the news, notable people, and historical moments connected to this date.

Portrait 1080 × 1920 PNG · created on your device

Filter by:

Headlines from May 17, 1930

AMERICAN GOLFERS BEAT BRITISH, 10-2, TO KEEP WALKER CUP; Capture 7 of the 8 Singles in Final of Tournament Over Links at Sandwich. JONES LEADS THE WAY Upsets Rival Captain, Wethered, 9 and 8--Moe, 7 Down, Rallies to Take His Match.MISS COLLETT IS DEFEATED Loses, 4 and 3, to 19-Year-Old Miss Fishwick in Women's TitlePlay at Formby. Moe Tells His Own Story. Great Iron Shot Decides. AMERICAN GOLFERS BEAT BRITISH, 10-2 Commanding Lead at Lunch. Stout Plays in Great Form. Tolley Erratic but Gets a Half. Jones All Square at Turn Voigt on Bad Terms With Putter. Ball Goes Into Spectator's Pocket.

By W.f. Leysmith. Special Cable To the New York Times.by W.f. Leysmith

Walker Cup won by Amers

None0 words
Continue reading...
Share

BRISTOL ATTACKS TREATY AS NAVY BOARD CHAIRMAN; DENIES IT GIVES US PARITY; SENATORS ASSAIL HIS VIEWS Reed and Robinson Join in Defense of Ships Allotted to Us. JONES RETURNS TO STAND Both Admirals Sharply Criticize 6-Inch Gun Cruisers as "A Type We Do Not Want." JAPAN TERMED STRONGER General Board Endorsed Light Armament Last Fall "Very Reluctantly," Says Jones. Both Insist on 8-Inch Guns. Reed Denies Disadvantage. General Navy Board's Opposition to Treaty Is Revealed Robinson Reads Memorandum. First Statement on Parity. Board "Never Suggested More." "Yardstick" Called "Camouflage." Bristol Speaks for Navy Board. Navy Board Policy. BUILDING AND MAINTENANCE POLICY. CAPITAL SHIPS. AIRCRAFT CARRIERS. CRUISERS. SMALL CRUISERS AND GUNBOATS. DESTROYERS. SUBMARINES. AIRCRAFT. Program Planned in 1927. 77,400 Tons of Destroyers. Britain's 1927 Claims Criticized. He Asks Series of Questions. Philippine Question Raised. Ratio Changed, Says Bristol. Bristol Cites "General Principle." Says There Is No "Yardstick." Question Broader, He Insists. Committee Recalls Jones. Reed Cites Japan's Concessi

By Special to The New York Times

Before Foreign Relations Com on London naval treaty

None0 words
Continue reading...
Share