HIGH COURT UPSETS INFORMATION CURB
Sup Ct on March 3 rules 8 to 1 that newspapers and radio and TV stations cannot be subjected to either criminal prosecution or civil damage suits for disseminating accurate information that is available from public law enforcement records; strikes down Ga law that makes it misdemeanor to print or broadcast name of rape victim; case represents 1st time that Ct was asked to rule that personal right to privacy could outweigh press freedom guarantees of 1st Amendment when resulting news rept was undisputedly true; Ct concludes that 'once true information is disclosed in public court documents open to public inspection, the press cannot be sanctioned for publishing it'; Assoc Justice Byron R White, who wrote majority opinion, appears to stop short of providing protection for accurate press accounts of inaccurate public records; forbids state interference with publication of 'truthful information contained in court records'; lone dissenter is Assoc Justice Rehnquist; actual trial of damage suit by Martin Cohn, father of rape victim Cynthia L Cohn against WSB-TV, Atlanta, has not yet been held; Justice White says he is confining majority opinion to 'narrower interface between press and privacy' rather than broader question whether truthful publications may ever be subjected to criminal or civil liability; Assoc Justice William O Douglas, in concuring statement, maintains that ruling should have been absolute, denying all govt power to interfere with publication of news (M)