News Analysis
By Bernard Gwertzman, Special To the New York Times
President Reagan's first comprehensive speech on East-West relations seems to mark a major shift in his own thinking about dealing with the Soviet Union that may even overshadow his specific proposals on sharply reducing each side's strategic arsenals. By calling for the start of talks on strategic arms as soon as next month without any conditions, and in suggesting that he and Leonid I. Brezhnev, the Soviet leader, could achieve ''positive results'' when they agree on a time and place to sit down and talk, Mr. Reagan has moved a long way since his early post-election statements that tightly linked arms control talks with Soviet ''policies of aggression'' around the world. Also, the generally firm but conciliatory speech in Eureka, Ill., in which he said that Soviet leaders shared his ''overriding interest in preventing the use of nuclear weapons,'' showed that after 16 months in office, Mr. Reagan was talking in a much more diplomatic way than in his first Presidential news conference, on Jan. 29, 1981, when he said that Soviet leaders had reserved ''the right to commit any crime, to lie, to cheat.'' Mr. Reagan, Administration officials said today, is being driven by a combination of factors. On the one hand, a senior aide said, despite the initial bluster of the Administration toward the Russians, Mr. Reagan personally has always believed in the value of discussion to resolve issues.