TAX EFFECT ON FAMILY ASSESSED
The assertion last week by Treasury Secretary James A. Baker 3d that ''the median-income family'' in every state would be better off under the Reagan Administration's tax plan is not borne out by an analysis of Government statistics. The figures show that in New York and several other states, couples with two wage-earners, two children, typical deductions and the median income for a family of that size in their state would owe slightly higher taxes under the Reagan proposals than they would owe if the law is not changed. Mr. Baker's assertion, in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee, was based on the premise that a family with median income - the level at which half the families earn more and half earn less - had only one wage-earner. Study of 2-Paycheck Homes Internal Revenue Service statistics show, however, that two-thirds of the couples earning between $30,000 and $40,000, the range where the median income falls in most states, have two wage-earners. Those families, under the present law, are entitled to a tax deduction that the President proposes to abolish.