How Investigation of Lab Fraud Grew Into a Cause Celebre
AS long as science proceeds relatively smoothly, it appears to be driven purely by reason and the answers given by nature in experiments. But when things go wrong, the human actors shed their masks of professional impassivity, and the emotional undercurrents of the scientific enterprise may suddenly emerge like the wizard behind the curtains in Oz. Last week the most celebrated investigation of scientific misconduct in years provided such a glimpse into the fallibility of human judgment. The case of Dr. Thereza Imanishi-Kari, and a paper she published with Dr. David Baltimore in 1986, began as a small dispute within her laboratory, and snowballed into a protracted conflict that pitted Dr. Baltimore and his many supporters in the scientific community against Congress and John D. Dingell's House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. The case has entangled the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Tufts University and many individuals, including leading biologists, in rounds of bitter controversy that have lasted five years and are still not completed.