TOP REPUBLICANS BREAK WITH BUSH ON IRAQ STRATEGY
By Todd S. Purdum and Patrick E. Tyler
Leading Republicans from Congress, State Dept and past administrations are breaking ranks with Pres Bush over his administration's high-profile planning for war with Iraq, saying administration has neither adequately prepared for military action nor made case that it is needed; say they favor eventual removal of Saddam Hussein, but that Bush is proceeding in way that risks alienating allies, creating greater instability in Middle East, and harming America's long-term interests; say administration has not shown that Iraq poses urgent threat to US; Brent Scowcroft, first Pres Bush's national security adviser, who helped build broad international coalition against Iraq in Persian Gulf War, writes opinion article in Wall Street Journal warning that attack on Iraq at this time would jeopardize, if not destroy, global counter-terrorist campaign; says attack might provoke Iraq to use chemicial or biological weapons in effort to trigger war between Israel and Arab world; Henry A Kissinger, in opinion article in Washington Post, makes long and complex argument about international complications of any military campaign; Sen Chuck Hagel, Republican who was among earliest voices to question Bush's approach to Iraq, claims CIA has 'absolutely no evidence' that Iraq possesses or will soon possess nuclear weapons (M)